Showing posts with label celine and julie go boating. Show all posts
Showing posts with label celine and julie go boating. Show all posts

Saturday, 16 October 2021

Down the Rabbit Hole Project: Celine and Julie Go Boating (1974): Hour 1 (identity, fluidity and houses)

 This is part 2 of a 4 post look at Rivette's 1974 film Celine and Julie go Boating. The introduction can be read here.

HOUR 1



"Besides, she’s she, and I’m I, and—oh dear, how puzzling it all is!" (Carroll, "Wonderland" , 14)

Unlike Alice, Celine and Julie are untroubled by their identities (even if it may be one sole person that exists) 

The first half of Celine and Julie Go Boating (1974) functions as an introduction to its characters and themes. For this first hour much emphasizes is placed upon Celine’s boredom with day to day living (specifically her job, her absent boyfriend and her empty flat) and the disruptive and welcome change Julie brings with her. In a sense Julie is a white Rabbit to Celine’s Alice at the beginning of the film. The film paints Celine and Julie’s meeting as seemingly pre-destined by tarot cards and library books. When the two do finally meet, Celine is destined to look after the now amnesiac Julie, and both are destined to solve the mystery of the house on rue des pommes. This first hour frequently presents themes of predestined fate, from Celine’s tarot cards to Julie’s stumble into Celine’s flat. 

"suddenly a White Rabbit with pink eyes ran close by her. There was nothing so very remarkable in that; nor did Alice think it so very much out of the way to hear the Rabbit say to itself, “Oh dear! Oh dear! I shall be late!” (Carroll, Wonderland, 2)




Scholar Beatrice Loayza identifies the first scene of Celine sitting on a park bench, reading a book and suddenly seeing Julie as “like the muttering White Rabbit running late for his appointment in Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland.” (Loayza, 2021, State of Play By making this the key first scene, Rivette places notions of carrollian whimsy at the forefront of his film. This can also be seen in this first half in the many scenes in which the two women swap identities (Julie becoming Celine to break up the other’s relationship to her boyfriend, Celine becoming Julie when she has to miss a magic show) In essence Rivette’s film absorbs the identity themes of Carroll’s novels and takes them to their furthest point: here both Alice like characters are “split” but are so intertwined that other characters easily mistake them for each other. As such Julie could also be considered an invention by Celine due to boredom or a projection of a more carefree side of her psyche. This could be a potential reason as to why Celine is not unnerved by Celine's sudden arrival at her flat and integration into her life. 




The first hour of the film is all about this act of merging identities and places. Many parts of this hour feel arbitrary but later take on a deeper significance. Celine standing in at the magic show and Julie annoying Celine’s boyfriend all seem like detours but can be also perceived as laying the groundwork for future intrigues. 
Like the Maries in Daisies (1966), an influence on this film, Celine and Julie's personalities appear Interchangeable and interlinked. Less hedonistic and a few years older than the 17 year old Maries of Daisies, Celine and Julie do share a similar sense of playfulness and by extension and Alice style sense of curiosity. Scholar Kirsten Yoonsoo Kim identifies that structurally this first hour also mimics Daisies,  "Céline... Julie... meet, move in together, and frolic around the city and fool men." Like the Maries, their identity swapping is an act of rebellion, the identity swapping detours involve both Celine and Julie not bowing to the wishes of the people around them: “Julie... intentionally blows an audition that might have catapulted Céline into globe-trotting fame” (Broughton, 2021, a Feminist adventure...

By smashing up other character’s perceptions and wants from them, Celine and Julie free themselves to dive head-first into the carrollian mystery of the house on rue des pommes. The house is at this point seen only in glimpses, Celine remembers glimpses of working there, but the audience at this point are only shown flashes. The most we glimpse of the house in this first hour is in an carroll like scene where Celine attempts to get into the house, after seeing a cat rush out of the door. The house is set up as a hanging mystery which is elaborated on much later in the film.

Essays:

Broughton, Lee "A feminist adventure unfolds when Celine and Julie Go Boating" Popmatters, January 9th, 2018. https://www.popmatters.com/celine-and-julie-go-boating-feminist-film-2522111673.html 

Kim, Kristen Yoonsoo. “The Triumph of 'Céline and Julie Go Boating'.” The Nation, April 6, 2021. https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/celine-julie-boating-review/

Loayza, Beatrice. “Céline and Julie Go Boating: State of Play.” The Criterion Collection. Accessed July 13, 2021. https://www.criterion.com/current/posts/7316-c-line-and-julie-go-boating-state-of-play. 

Books:

Carroll, Lewis "Alice's adventures in Wonderland" London: Puffin Books, 1994.

  

Tuesday, 13 July 2021

Down the Rabbit hole project: An introduction to Celine and Julie go boating

We didn’t have a message. We wanted to create a performance film, a magical film.” Julliet Berto on Celine and Julie go boating 

 "I had sent my heroine straight down a rabbit-hole ... without the least idea what was to happen afterwards" - Charles Dodgson (Lewis Carroll) on the creation of Alice's adventures in Wonderland

CONTEXT

Made in 1974 by French New wave director Jacques Rivette and filmed over a summer in paris, Celine and Julie go boating is a bizarre looping dream of a film about 2 interconnected Parisian women who share each others lives and stumble upon a mystery in a house which involves memory, a troubled young girl and magic sweets. 


For the basis of this film Jaques Rivette performed a “controlled improvisation” with the actors, mainly the two leads, Juliet Berto and Dominique Labourier. In particular Juliet Berto remembers that during filming “we started off with the notion of amusing ourselves by creating interchangeable characters”. (Berto, Celine and Julie... BFI booklet) This freewheeling nature also extended to the narrative itself. For example the key story point of the magic sweets that transport Celine and Julie in and out of the world in the mysterious house was thought of by Rivette quite late: “it allowed us to link all the elements together to provide… a mechanism for holding the film together” (Rivette, Celine and Julie.. BFI booklet)

 Other examples of spontaneous ideas are identified by essayist Beatrice Loayza. For example of the chase sequence towards the beginning of the film, where Celine runs after Julie in the streets of Paris: “Rivette’s handheld 16 mm camera captures Berto and Labourier’s antics and comes across as free and spontaneous” (Loayza, 2021, State of Play


Due to the sheer weight of ideas and lines used from the actors in the film, from small ideas to last night’s dreams. Of the process, Labourier who played Julie, reminisced:  “We got up early in the morning and told each other our dreams, which the film depended on” (Labourier, 2021, state...) . As such, the script for Celine and Jullie is split in attribution several ways. “scénario” credits are given to “Berto / Labourier / Ogier / Pisier / Rivette” (Kristen Yoonsoo Kim, 2021, Thick as Thieves) Nearly all of the main actors are credited with the story. 

The other major influence on the film was literature, particularly the Victorian melodramas of Henry James, and also the whimsy and nonsense of Lewis Carroll. Carroll’s influence is a strong one and shines through clearly, even down to the impromptu story ideas, and the dream logic tone the film takes, Celine and Julie’s curiosity “It doesn’t matter who understands Céline and Julie so long as they understand each other.” (Kristen Yoonsoo Kim, 2021, Thick...) this is also prominently seen in film’s detours into other worlds. 

Note:

We have covered the French New Wave era of cinema previously in Down the Rabbit Hole project essays with Zazie dans le metro, Black Moon and Alice or the Last Escapade respectively. 

REFERENCES:

Essays:

Kim, Kristen Yoonsoo. “The Triumph of 'Céline and Julie Go Boating'.” The Nation, April 6, 2021. https://www.thenation.com/article/culture/celine-julie-boating-review/

Loayza, Beatrice. “Céline and Julie Go Boating: State of Play.” The Criterion Collection. Accessed July 13, 2021. https://www.criterion.com/current/posts/7316-c-line-and-julie-go-boating-state-of-play. 

Booklets:

BFI. Celine and Julie Go Boating. London: BFI, 2004. Essay booklet from the UK BFI DVD

Monday, 28 June 2021

Celine and Julie Go Boating: a down the rabbit hole project special




















This summer down the rabbit hole film reviews are back, but I will only be looking at one film. Because the film in question is 3 hours and 19 minutes long, making it the longest film I have explored for this project.










Celine et Julie vont au bateau, or Celine and Julie go Boating, is a sprawling labyrinthine film about bored Celine who upon befriending magician Julie, finds they begin to share lives and relationships. When Celine one day stumbles out of a mysterious house with no memory of what happened to her there, the two friends become entangled in a complex mystery involving magical sweets and a potential murder. 

In French, "to go boating" or "vont au bateau" is similar to the English phrase "a shaggy dog story" essentially it means to become entwined in a unbelievable story.  You can probably guess how this theme links in with the film and also Carroll's Alice

I have put this film off due to its length, so I have decided to essay/review this in parts.

Here on the blog we will have 3/4 essays corresponding with different parts of the film (context, 1 hour, 2 hour, ending) whereas on Instagram you might be able to see my notes for each hour with first thoughts...

Very much aware that I have probably bitten off more than I can chew here but if ACMI thinks this film is Carrollian... it would be amiss for this blog not to explore this work. 

My attempt at essays for this film starts this July, wish me luck :)